The interface rewards ignorance because ignorance travels fast. A short clip from 'Punchin'' turns into a national argument, and the algorithm pays the loudest voices with reach, which encourages people to perform outrage instead of understanding. The facts are not mysterious: Wales has devolved institutions, the Senedd exists, and the modern settlement follows the 1997 referendum and the Government of Wales Act 1998. What is mysterious is why we keep treating podcasts as if they are constitutional conventions. The smart move is not to punish a creator forever; it is to build better friction, context labels, and incentives that favour correction over escalation. Her apology and claim of learning are useful data points, but they are drowned when the platform keeps serving the same clip to people primed to fight. If we want fewer of these storms, we must redesign the system that monetises them, not just yell at the latest person holding the mic. Otherwise we are building a machine that manufactures more Tennessees on schedule.